refnotes:bib

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
refnotes:bib [2025/04/06 22:31] team1refnotes:bib [2025/06/15 20:12] (current) team1
Line 415: Line 415:
 ABSTRACT={<p>The physical boundaries of office work have become increasingly flexible. Work is conducted at multiple locations outside the office, such as at clients’ premises, at home, in cafés, or when traveling. However, the boundary between indoor and outdoor environment seems to be strong and normative regarding how office work is performed. The aim of this study was to explore how office work may be conducted outdoors, understanding how it is being experienced by office employees and identifying its contextual preconditions. Based on a two-year interactive research project, the study was conducted together with a Swedish municipality. Fifty-eight participants engaged in the collaborative learning process, including 40 half-day workshops and reflective group discussions, co-interviews, and participants’ independent experimentation of bringing work activities outdoors. Data was collected via interviews, group discussions and a custom-made mobile application. The results showed that a wide range of work activities could be done outdoors, both individually and in collaboration with others. Outdoor work activities were associated with many positive experiences by contributing to a sense of well-being, recovery, autonomy, enhanced cognition, better communication, and social relations, but also with feelings of guilt and illegitimacy. Conditions of importance for outdoor office work to happen and function well were found in the physical environment, where proximity to urban greenspaces stood out as important, but also in the sociocultural and organizational domains. Of crucial importance was managers’ attitudes, as well as the overall organizational culture on this idea of bringing office work outdoors. To conclude, if working life is to benefit from outdoor office work, leaders, urban planners and policymakers need to collaborate and show the way out.</p>}} ABSTRACT={<p>The physical boundaries of office work have become increasingly flexible. Work is conducted at multiple locations outside the office, such as at clients’ premises, at home, in cafés, or when traveling. However, the boundary between indoor and outdoor environment seems to be strong and normative regarding how office work is performed. The aim of this study was to explore how office work may be conducted outdoors, understanding how it is being experienced by office employees and identifying its contextual preconditions. Based on a two-year interactive research project, the study was conducted together with a Swedish municipality. Fifty-eight participants engaged in the collaborative learning process, including 40 half-day workshops and reflective group discussions, co-interviews, and participants’ independent experimentation of bringing work activities outdoors. Data was collected via interviews, group discussions and a custom-made mobile application. The results showed that a wide range of work activities could be done outdoors, both individually and in collaboration with others. Outdoor work activities were associated with many positive experiences by contributing to a sense of well-being, recovery, autonomy, enhanced cognition, better communication, and social relations, but also with feelings of guilt and illegitimacy. Conditions of importance for outdoor office work to happen and function well were found in the physical environment, where proximity to urban greenspaces stood out as important, but also in the sociocultural and organizational domains. Of crucial importance was managers’ attitudes, as well as the overall organizational culture on this idea of bringing office work outdoors. To conclude, if working life is to benefit from outdoor office work, leaders, urban planners and policymakers need to collaborate and show the way out.</p>}}
  
 +@MISC{Crook2020,
 +  author  = "{Crook}",
 +  title   = "{Powerhouse Company reveals floating off-grid office in Rotterdam}",
 +  url     = "{https://www.dezeen.com/2020/02/04/powerhouse-company-sustainable-floating-office-rotterdam/}",
 +  urldate = "{}",
 +  year    = "{2020}",
 +  address = "{}",  
 +}
 +
 +@MISC{soofa2024,
 +  author  = "{Changing Environments, Inc.}",
 +  title   = "{Soofa}",
 +  url     = "{https://soofadigital.com/}",
 +  urldate = "{}",
 +  year    = "{2024}",
 +  address = "{}",
 +}
 +
 +@MISC{strawberrye2025,
 +  author  = "{Strawberry Energy}",
 +  title   = "{Smart Bench 1 symbolises the flow and transformation from solar to electrical energy.}",
 +  url     = "{https://strawberrye.com/smart-bench-1/}",
 +  urldate = "{}",
 +  year    = "{2025}",
 +  address = "{}",
 +}
 +
 +@MISC{kubee2024,
 +  author  = "{Kubee}",
 +  title   = "{Phone charging and free wifi
 +on the solar powered smartbenches}",
 +  url     = "{https://kuube.hu/en/}",
 +  urldate = "{}",
 +  year    = "{2024}",
 +  address = "{}",
 +}
 +
 +@MISC{amai2021,
 +  author  = "{Dirk Wynants for Extremis}",
 +  title   = "{AMAi}",
 +  url     = "{https://www.extremis.com/en/collections/amai/amai}",
 +  urldate = "{}",
 +  year    = "{2021}",
 +  address = "{}",
 +}
 +
 +@MISC{eps2023_t1,
 +  author  = "{EPS 2023 - Amplea}",
 +  title   = "{Ergonomic Adjustable Furniture}",
 +  url     = "{https://www.eps2023-wiki1.dee.isep.ipp.pt/doku.php?id=report}",
 +  urldate = "{}",
 +  year    = "{2023}",
 +  address = "{}",
 +}
 +
 +@MISC{eps2021_t3,
 +  author  = "{EPS 2021 - FreeDesk}",
 +  title   = "{Ergonomic Reconfigurable Home-Desk}",
 +  url     = "{https://www.eps2021-wiki3.dee.isep.ipp.pt/doku.php?id=report}",
 +  urldate = "{}",
 +  year    = "{2021}",
 +  address = "{}",
 +}
 +
 +@MISC{Guevara2024,
 +  author  = "{Patricia Guevara}",
 +  title   = "{A Guide to Understanding 5x5 Risk Assessment Matrix}",
 +  url     = "{https://safetyculture.com/topics/risk-assessment/5x5-risk-matrix/}",
 +  urldate = "{}",
 +  year    = "{2024}",
 +  address = "{}",
 +}
 +
 +@MISC{sixsigma2024,
 +  author  = "{SixSigma.us}",
 +  title   = "{Your Guide to Stakeholder Analysis Matrix: Master Project Management}",
 +  url     = "{https://www.6sigma.us/project-management/stakeholder-analysis-matrix/}",
 +  urldate = "{}",
 +  year    = "{2024}",
 +  address = "{}",
 +}
 +
 +@misc{EU2014_35,
 +title = {Directive 2014/35/EU on Low Voltage},
 +howpublished = {Official Journal of the European Union L96},
 +year = {2014},
 +note = {Accessed 5 June 2025}
 +}
 +
 +@misc{EU2014_30,
 +title = {Directive 2014/30/EU on Electromagnetic Compatibility},
 +howpublished = {Official Journal of the European Union L96},
 +year = {2014},
 +note = {Accessed 5 June 2025}
 +}
 +
 +@misc{EU2014_53,
 +title = {Directive 2014/53/EU on Radio Equipment},
 +howpublished = {Official Journal of the European Union L153},
 +year = {2014},
 +note = {Accessed 5 June 2025}
 +}
 +
 +@misc{EU2011_65,
 +title = {Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS II)},
 +howpublished = {Official Journal of the European Union L174},
 +year = {2011},
 +note = {Accessed 5 June 2025}
 +}
 +
 +@misc{EU2001_95,
 +title = {Directive 2001/95/EC on General Product Safety},
 +howpublished = {Official Journal of the European Union L11},
 +year = {2001},
 +note = {Accessed 5 June 2025}
 +}
 +
 +@misc{EU2019_771,
 +title = {Directive (EU) 2019/771 on the Sale of Goods},
 +howpublished = {Official Journal of the European Union L136},
 +year = {2019},
 +note = {Accessed 5 June 2025}
 +}
 +
 +@misc{ETSI303645,
 +title = {{ETSI EN 303 645}: Cybersecurity for Consumer IoT},
 +howpublished = {European Telecommunications Standards Institute},
 +year = {2024},
 +note = {Accessed 5 June 2025}
 +}
 +
 +@MISC{ShinrinYoku,
 +    title = "{Shinrin-yoku --- {Wikipedia}{,} The Free Encyclopedia}",
 +    url = "{https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shinrin-yoku&oldid=1295177120}",
 +    year = "{2025}",
 +  }
 +  
 +  
  
 </code> </code>
  • refnotes/bib.1743975069.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2025/04/06 22:31
  • by team1