Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| report [2025/06/16 04:25] – [7.6 Prototype] team1 | report [2025/06/22 18:33] (current) – [3.11 Sprint Outcomes] team1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 324: | Line 324: | ||
| ^ Task ^ Proposed date ^ Effective date^ | ^ Task ^ Proposed date ^ Effective date^ | ||
| |Choose the project proposal| 2025-03-01 | |Choose the project proposal| 2025-03-01 | ||
| - | |System Diagrams & Structural Drafts| 2025-03-12 | + | |System Diagrams & Structural Drafts| 2025-03-12 |
| |Project Backlog, Global Sprint Plan, Initial Sprint Plan and Release Gantt Chart| 2025-03-15 | |Project Backlog, Global Sprint Plan, Initial Sprint Plan and Release Gantt Chart| 2025-03-15 | ||
| |List of Components and Materials| 2025-03-19 | |List of Components and Materials| 2025-03-19 | ||
| Line 330: | Line 330: | ||
| |Interim Report | 2025-04-06 |2025-04-06| | |Interim Report | 2025-04-06 |2025-04-06| | ||
| |Interim Presentation| 2025-04-10 |2025-04-10| | |Interim Presentation| 2025-04-10 |2025-04-10| | ||
| - | |3D model video| 2025-04-15 |2025-04-15 and the final version at | | + | |3D model video| 2025-04-15 |2025-04-15 and the final version at 2025-05-28 |
| |Final List of Materials| 2025-04-29 |2025-04-29| | |Final List of Materials| 2025-04-29 |2025-04-29| | ||
| |Refined Interim Report| 2025-05-02 |2025-05-02| | |Refined Interim Report| 2025-05-02 |2025-05-02| | ||
| |Packaging Solution| 2025-05-14 |2025-05-14| | |Packaging Solution| 2025-05-14 |2025-05-14| | ||
| |Functional Tests| 2025-05-28 |2025-05-28| | |Functional Tests| 2025-05-28 |2025-05-28| | ||
| - | |Final Report, Presentation, | + | |Final Report, Presentation, |
| - | |Final Presentation| 2025-06-18 || | + | |Final Presentation| 2025-06-18 |2025-06-18| |
| - | |Refined Final Report| 2025-06-25 || | + | |Refined Final Report| 2025-06-25 |2025-06-22| |
| - | |Prototype and User Manual| 2025-04-10 || | + | |
| </ | </ | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 725: | Line 724: | ||
| | O | Functional Tests | Done | | | O | Functional Tests | Done | | ||
| | P | Final Report | | P | Final Report | ||
| - | | Q | Presentation | + | | Q | Presentation |
| - | | R | Video | Ongoing | + | | R | Video | Done |
| | S | Paper | Done | | | S | Paper | Done | | ||
| | T | Poster | | T | Poster | ||
| | U | Manual | | U | Manual | ||
| - | | V | Upload | + | | V | Upload |
| | W | Prototype | | W | Prototype | ||
| | X | Change the interim report | | X | Change the interim report | ||
| Line 792: | Line 791: | ||
| | 13 | P | 4 | All | All | | | 13 | P | 4 | All | All | | ||
| | 13 | Q | 4 | All | All | | | 13 | Q | 4 | All | All | | ||
| + | | 14 | R | 3 | Pierre | ||
| + | | 14 | P | 4 | All | All | | ||
| + | | 14 | Q | 4 | All | All | | ||
| + | | 14 | V | 4 | All | All | | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 849: | Line 852: | ||
| | 13 | P | 4 | All | All |Ongoing| | | 13 | P | 4 | All | All |Ongoing| | ||
| | 13 | Q | 4 | All | All |Ongoing| | | 13 | Q | 4 | All | All |Ongoing| | ||
| + | | 14 | R | 3 | Pierre | ||
| + | | 14 | P | 4 | All | All |Done| | ||
| + | | 14 | Q | 4 | All | All |Done| | ||
| + | | 14 | V | 4 | All | All |Done| | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Line 1151: | Line 1158: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| In this sprint, the planned work was developed during the sprint. However, the team added a task on day three related to load and stress simulations. All this information is present in image {{ref> | In this sprint, the planned work was developed during the sprint. However, the team added a task on day three related to load and stress simulations. All this information is present in image {{ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP round box> | ||
| + | <table table-sprint-14> | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | <WRAP center> | ||
| + | ^ Product Backlog Item ^ Assignee | ||
| + | |Minute and week report |Tomás|0.5|Done| | ||
| + | |Refined list of materials|Pierre|5|Done| | ||
| + | |Finish the video|Pierre|8|Done| | ||
| + | |Finish the presentation|All|6|Done| | ||
| + | |Explanation of power budget and electrical diagram|Pierre|16|Done| | ||
| + | |Chapter 4|Aaro|6|Done| | ||
| + | |Chapter 7|Pierre and Waad|8|Done| | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | <figure figure-sprint-14> | ||
| + | {{ : | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | In this sprint, the planned work was developed during the sprint. All this information is present in image {{ref> | ||
| ==== - Sprint Evaluations ==== | ==== - Sprint Evaluations ==== | ||
| Line 1998: | Line 2030: | ||
| The middle steel profile also incorporated a technical opening, which allowed cables to safely and neatly pass through the floor to and from the table, benches, and roof components. The technical opening denies any mechanical damage to wiring while storing them out of weather conditions, while maintaining a clean and manageable energy distribution system throughout the structure. | The middle steel profile also incorporated a technical opening, which allowed cables to safely and neatly pass through the floor to and from the table, benches, and roof components. The technical opening denies any mechanical damage to wiring while storing them out of weather conditions, while maintaining a clean and manageable energy distribution system throughout the structure. | ||
| As for the sockets, usb-c ports, and control switches have been carefully positioned- especially on the side of the table- to allow for universal and ergonometric functionality including for wheelchair users. | As for the sockets, usb-c ports, and control switches have been carefully positioned- especially on the side of the table- to allow for universal and ergonometric functionality including for wheelchair users. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **__Material selection__** | ||
| + | |||
| + | The material selection for this workstation design was based on structural performance, | ||
| + | The foundation is a concrete base that has good stability and compressive strength. This ensures that the entire structure is well anchored in relation to the environment and can withstand environmental pressure like wind and uneven ground. The team then used wooden joists to construct wooden decking, which was chosen for its natural appearance and warm texture, with durable properties for a weathered and stable walking surface. | ||
| + | The table and benches- the seating surfaces are composed of **oak wood** for durability, exterior weather resistance, and appearance. The legs of each bench and the table are made of aluminium for its corrosion resistance and lightweight characteristics, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Another feature at the bottom of the structure is a custom **aluminium** footrest in a chargable, interesting, | ||
| + | The central structural column is made from **S355 structural steel**. While aluminium was initially considered for its lightness, S355 steel was ultimately chosen due to its superior strength and lower cost for structural applications. | ||
| + | |||
| + | S355 steel provides the necessary load means for the central core to take the upper structures and the roof. The central structure has a cylindrical wooden form cover, the wooden form helps to provide warmth and softness visually, while also integrating the central core as part of the rest of the wood elements in the design. | ||
| + | The roof is also made from S355 steel to ensure it is able to safely support the loading of the photovoltaic system and retractable shade systems. The strength and stability of steel is important to manage wind load and the weight of the photovoltaic system. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Lastly, at the nase of the central structure, a custom aluminium box is incorporated to hold electrical components like batteries, controllers, | ||
| + | |||
| **__Drawings__** | **__Drawings__** | ||
| Line 2350: | Line 2398: | ||
| In the prototype, due to the decision to prepare it with lightweight materials and scaled, as well as due to lack of access to the mechanical components at the moment of assembling it, the prototype does not include automatic adjustments of the originally ergonomic benches and table. | In the prototype, due to the decision to prepare it with lightweight materials and scaled, as well as due to lack of access to the mechanical components at the moment of assembling it, the prototype does not include automatic adjustments of the originally ergonomic benches and table. | ||
| - | The initial idea to counter this obstable | + | The initial idea to counter this obstacle |
| Therefore, the prototype in the field of adjustability sets on the illustration of the core idea of how the product should work, although the adjustments still have to be done manually. | Therefore, the prototype in the field of adjustability sets on the illustration of the core idea of how the product should work, although the adjustments still have to be done manually. | ||
| Line 2457: | Line 2505: | ||
| < | < | ||
| <WRAP center> | <WRAP center> | ||
| - | ^ Use case ^ Description | + | ^ Use case ^ Result |
| | UC1 - Automatic Lighting | Pass | | | UC1 - Automatic Lighting | Pass | | ||
| | UC2 - Adjustable work surface height | Pass | | | UC2 - Adjustable work surface height | Pass | | ||
| Line 2464: | Line 2512: | ||
| | UC5 - Manually operated awnings | Pass | | | UC5 - Manually operated awnings | Pass | | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| - | </ | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| The adjustable work surface is manually operated on the prototype. | The adjustable work surface is manually operated on the prototype. | ||
| Line 2500: | Line 2548: | ||
| A formal usability review using the System Usability Scale (SUS) is planned for the next testing cycles (future evaluation). The current prototype supports basic user interactions (i.e., lighting feedback, visibility of data on OLED), and further evaluation is needed to examine the intuitiveness, | A formal usability review using the System Usability Scale (SUS) is planned for the next testing cycles (future evaluation). The current prototype supports basic user interactions (i.e., lighting feedback, visibility of data on OLED), and further evaluation is needed to examine the intuitiveness, | ||
| ==== - Summary ==== | ==== - Summary ==== | ||
| - | //Provide here the conclusions | + | |
| + | This chapter presented | ||
| ===== - Conclusions ===== | ===== - Conclusions ===== | ||